Solutions Newspaper Article Post

In Nudd’s article in the New York Times, he states “in order to give the bright as well as the dull child a square deal, it is obviously necessary that they be grouped on the basis of their individual ability and flexible program of instruction be adapted to their needs.”  He believes this system would be the best way for a student to get the proper education needed.  Nudd also believes this won’t only benefit the students, but parents and the public, as well.  He suggests that students should be broken up and separated into schools that fit their ability.  There would be schools for the superior, the bright, the normal, the dull-normal, the mentally deficient, and the neurotic.

The problems with his proposed system include needing more facilities for the segregation of students.  Additionally, in order for there to be a change from the current system, it must include people, “burying many unfortunate prejudices and facing the situation in a broad-minded and statesman-like fashion.” However, there are some negatives aspects to this separation system he plans on being the solution.

I believe Nudd is unrealistic to believe that parents would accept having their children placed into schools for the dull-normal, the mentally deficient, ect.  The labeling of these children from the beginning and by placing them into certain schools will handicap these students psychologically for life.  I do not know what Nudd is thinking. This is not the solution to the grading problem, but rather opens new more severe problems.

"Nudd Praises Plan for School Survey." New York Times (1857-1922): 37. Oct 01 1922. ProQuest. Web. 25 Mar. 2013.